From a purely legal standpoint, purchasing from GoG is still only purchasing a license for a game, no different from Steam, Epic, any other online game storefront, and no different from buying physical.
All game purchases, for decades, have only been purchases of a license.
WRONG!
It’s true that GoG is exactly like Steam is exactly like buying a physical disk, but none of those things are “licenses!” In all of the cases, you are buying an individual copy of the game, not “licensing” a damn thing! It’s exactly the same as buying any other piece of media going all the way back to paper books, and nobody (honest and sane) is trying to bullshit us about those being “licensed.”
“Licensed, not sold” is 100% a lie in service of the copyright cartel.
It’s a shame, because your comment was otherwise correct and excellent except for that one crucial point.
No, I really don’t need to do that. You’ve presupposed the EULA is somehow valid, which it is not. It fails to meet the basic elements of a contract and is therefore bunk.
WRONG!
It’s true that GoG is exactly like Steam is exactly like buying a physical disk, but none of those things are “licenses!” In all of the cases, you are buying an individual copy of the game, not “licensing” a damn thing! It’s exactly the same as buying any other piece of media going all the way back to paper books, and nobody (honest and sane) is trying to bullshit us about those being “licensed.”
“Licensed, not sold” is 100% a lie in service of the copyright cartel.
It’s a shame, because your comment was otherwise correct and excellent except for that one crucial point.
You really ought to read the EULA attached to almost any commercially sold software. It’s all liscensed. Even GoG installers.
No, I really don’t need to do that. You’ve presupposed the EULA is somehow valid, which it is not. It fails to meet the basic elements of a contract and is therefore bunk.
Yeah, I wonder what the L in EULA stands for. Hmm.