The dearth of detail highlights the editorial stance of the publication; the term that comes to mind is cowardice.
Yeah, AP has a reputation for trustworthiness through a lack of bias, but in reality their dogmatic insistence on ABSOLUTE neutrality in the face of objective reality is both cowardly and a tremendous bias itself that renders them less trustworthy than those partisan sources that don’t hide their bias.
Was speaking more towards policy and process rather than mode of transport.
Disingenuous at best, blatant obfuscation at worst.
The dearth of detail highlights the editorial stance of the publication; the term that comes to mind is cowardice.
Yeah, AP has a reputation for trustworthiness through a lack of bias, but in reality their dogmatic insistence on ABSOLUTE neutrality in the face of objective reality is both cowardly and a tremendous bias itself that renders them less trustworthy than those partisan sources that don’t hide their bias.
That appears to be an open question that would be an entire article unto itself. As in, not the focus of this article.
The article was only about 4 short paragraphs when I posted it four hours ago, with zero analysis. It’s got a lot more now.