• Ethalia
    link
    fedilink
    English
    441 year ago

    If they make this mandatory in any way later you can probably expect half of Japan to stop using Twitter due to their privacy laws

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      161 year ago

      I believe this is only for users that want the blue tick in which case it sort of makes sense that to be “verified” means they infact have verified that you are who you claim to be.

      Requiring a picture of you ID seems very 2005 though

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        Steam does the exact same thing if you want to publish a game as a sole proprietor. Picture of both sides of ID then selfie with ID.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          131 year ago

          Though it’s a big difference to comply with business KYC requirements than to simply have a cool icon by your username.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 year ago

            Yeah huge difference. I’m not sharing my actual PII with a social media website, let alone a centralised one run by a fascist 🤢

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        Requiring a picture of you ID seems very 2005 though

        What’s the more 2023/contemporary alternative for verification?

        Fully sequenced genome with attached dickpick and certified bathwater sample?

        • Mkengine
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          Here in Germany I think our ID cards use NFC, I can identify for Government related stuff by pressing my ID card on my phone. Last time I did this for some free energy cost related money from the government due to the war.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          EDIT: Here’s an explanation I saw earlier of how it’s done in Finland:

          How we do it here in Finland is that there are digital identity providers which use bank/mobile carrier to identify you. They then use MFA when identifying you. Any service can use these services to do strong authentication for you. And they don’t cost anything for the customer, and is really cheap for the company who wants to identify you. It is also build into the law that you must identify people using these, to avoid identity theft.

    • @fne8w2ahOP
      link
      English
      91 year ago

      Same with EU and UK cos GDPR.