No, Biden never did that. You posting this as proof of your assertion is absolutely absurd and really shows that deluded misinformation is as rife on the left as it is on the right.
Every fucking president has a readiness plan for Iran going back to 1979, at least. That was due to the geopolitical tensions involved. This guy never said Biden was planning on attacking Iran, he said it was considered.
And even more pathetically, you’re trying to imply that this is the equivalent of Trump starting the current war to distract from Epstein, which is absolutely ridiculous and in NO WAY proven by your source.
It truly is sickening how intentionally dishonest people like you can be to push your “both sides” delusion.
That’s not what I said. I still understand the source differently than you do. Neither did you provide any evidence that the war is in direct connection to the Epstein files (which btw also includes a number of Democrats) but we already derailed from the topic so let’s get back.
your “both sides” delusion
“both sides” implies that there are only two. The post was about the relationship between Mamdani and the Democratic mainstream. Take the issues he’s famous for and ask yourself what the mainstream position of the two big parties of the US is. Talking about tWo siDEs silences all the other possible positions (to be clear, I’m not saying you’re doing it on purpose).
My comment was about why the Democratic Party as a whole will never adopt Mamdani’s policies. Is that something we can agree on?
No, Biden never did that. You posting this as proof of your assertion is absolutely absurd and really shows that deluded misinformation is as rife on the left as it is on the right.
Every fucking president has a readiness plan for Iran going back to 1979, at least. That was due to the geopolitical tensions involved. This guy never said Biden was planning on attacking Iran, he said it was considered.
And even more pathetically, you’re trying to imply that this is the equivalent of Trump starting the current war to distract from Epstein, which is absolutely ridiculous and in NO WAY proven by your source.
It truly is sickening how intentionally dishonest people like you can be to push your “both sides” delusion.
That’s not what I said. I still understand the source differently than you do. Neither did you provide any evidence that the war is in direct connection to the Epstein files (which btw also includes a number of Democrats) but we already derailed from the topic so let’s get back.
“both sides” implies that there are only two. The post was about the relationship between Mamdani and the Democratic mainstream. Take the issues he’s famous for and ask yourself what the mainstream position of the two big parties of the US is. Talking about tWo siDEs silences all the other possible positions (to be clear, I’m not saying you’re doing it on purpose).
My comment was about why the Democratic Party as a whole will never adopt Mamdani’s policies. Is that something we can agree on?