No, the OP is describing a completely different concept. This isn’t an argument about only the statutory language applying, it’s a statement that when phrases have commonly agreedupon meanings, attempting to use them differently is actively wasting your audience’s time.
No, the OP is describing a completely different concept. This isn’t an argument about only the statutory language applying, it’s a statement that when phrases have commonly agreedupon meanings, attempting to use them differently is actively wasting your audience’s time.
Well as long we’re arguing about the definitions and use of words the elites are happy.