Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Wednesday hinted that Israel could take unilateral military action against Iran as diplomatic efforts continued to secure an agreement aimed at ending the conflict between Tehran and Washington, Anadolu reports.

Archived version: https://archive.is/newest/https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20260805-israels-netanyahu-hints-at-unilateral-military-action-against-iran-amid-regional-de-escalation-efforts/


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

  • Eat_Your_Paisley
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    Are you serious

    The Yom Kippur was was against Egypt and Syria and took 19 days which lead the a UN presence in the horn of Africa for 50 years

    • Carmakazi@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      The “badass Israeli military beset on all sides by enemies and standing strong” narrative has basically lost all sympathy in recent years.

      While they’re not just some militia rabble, Egypt and Syria are far from a competent force.

      Israel has a lot of expensive weapon systems funded by US taxpayers and a small corps of commandos adept at violating international law and sovereignty to achieve objectives, but the bulk of their forces are poorly trained and disciplined conscripts. Against a truly professional force I think they would get throttled. Is Iran that kind of force? Remains to be seen I suppose.

      • Eat_Your_Paisley
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        By their record the IDF isn’t poorly trained, and we weren’t arguing fiscal and weapons support we were arguing that Isreal isn’t willing to sacrifice their own to fight.

        Is real has won every war they participated in until the US military got involved.

        • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          War is supply chains. Ramadan War was won because of US supply chains beating that of USSR. Saying that Israel won the war solo is insane and shows your clear lack of knowledge.

          • Eat_Your_Paisley
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            All war is about supply chains, do you think the Israelis haven’t secured their supply chains in 50 years?

            • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              I know they haven’t. They literally have none. They are 100% dependent on US and after the next election cycle that ends.

              • Eat_Your_Paisley
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                2 months ago

                They’ve won and taken territory in every war they’ve been involved in witbout US troops.

                • mrdownBanned
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  With significant aid and loans from Germany , France and the USA

                • mrdownBanned
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Egypt achieved it’s goal during the war it was never to regain the sinai by force but to force israel to the negociation table

                  Israeli policymakers and intelligence officials also believed that Sadat desired only to boost the Arab bargaining position. Hafez Ismail was to meet with Henry Kissinger on 19 May 1973.Israel felt that Egypt was particularly frustrated by the continued stalemate, especially related to the negotiations concerning its lost territory. Egyptian hopes of renewed Soviet support were also a source of disappointment, as the Soviets became wary of balancing its position between Egypt and the United States. Instead of picking up on various clues that Sadat was becoming restless about the deadlock, David Elazar, the Chief of State of the Israel Defense Forces, stressed that the Egyptian activity was merely meant to raise Sadat’s clout during the 34 Parker, Richard B. The October War: A Retrospective. Miami: University Press of Florida, negotiations between the superpowers and Israel. Thus, any military exercises held in Egypt were perceived as being part of Sadat’s tactic to create a menacing atmosphere before the talks and serve to increase his bargaining power.

                  https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/2012-12-10D.pdf