Ahh, so you’re a genocide apologist.
Yeah further conversation between us will not be productive, I agree.
Edit: Since you asked:
o you genuinely believe China has become so advanced at information control that they’ve managed to pull off the first secret genocide in history? Or is it more likely that Zenz, the CIA, and the ETIC are lying?
I think you’re ignoring evidence because it conflicts with your ideology, yes.
You haven’t presented any evidence. A wikipedia article and a Western NGO opinion piece are not sources. If you want to find a primary source please bring it to the table, but so far all you’ve done is repeat lies said by known liars with strong ideological incentive to slander China.
Hey I thought you said “I won’t be coming back to refute it?” I guess you forgot the meaning of your own words.
I, unlike you, actually do the things I say I’m going to do. I said this conversation is over - and it is. You know why? Because I do not debate conspiracy theory-riddled asshole wackaloons who apologize for genocide.
There was nothing to refute. I came back to point out that shitting all over the board and pretending you’d won isn’t the same as winning, pigeon boy.
Because I do not debate conspiracy theory-riddled asshole wackaloons who apologize for genocide.
But you clearly are happy to carry water for conspiracy theory riddled theocrats who lie about genocide. Keep going through life believing that the US State Department is trustworthy. It will definitely not bite you on the ass at any point.
I don’t give a shit what you’re pointing out. I refuse to argue with genocide deniers.
Now I’m blocking you. Bye Bye.
P.S. If you really think the Ughur genocide is some kind of conspiracy theory invented by the west to make China look bad then you’ve got some serious mental problems. Wake up and smell the bullshit please.
Ahh, so you’re a genocide apologist.
Yeah further conversation between us will not be productive, I agree.
Edit: Since you asked:
I think you’re ignoring evidence because it conflicts with your ideology, yes.
You haven’t presented any evidence. A wikipedia article and a Western NGO opinion piece are not sources. If you want to find a primary source please bring it to the table, but so far all you’ve done is repeat lies said by known liars with strong ideological incentive to slander China.
Hey I thought you said “I won’t be coming back to refute it?” I guess you forgot the meaning of your own words. I, unlike you, actually do the things I say I’m going to do. I said this conversation is over - and it is. You know why? Because I do not debate conspiracy theory-riddled asshole wackaloons who apologize for genocide.
There was nothing to refute. I came back to point out that shitting all over the board and pretending you’d won isn’t the same as winning, pigeon boy.
But you clearly are happy to carry water for conspiracy theory riddled theocrats who lie about genocide. Keep going through life believing that the US State Department is trustworthy. It will definitely not bite you on the ass at any point.
I don’t give a shit what you’re pointing out. I refuse to argue with genocide deniers.
Now I’m blocking you. Bye Bye.
P.S. If you really think the Ughur genocide is some kind of conspiracy theory invented by the west to make China look bad then you’ve got some serious mental problems. Wake up and smell the bullshit please.
WaKe Up aNd sMeLl ThE BuLlShIt!
As if you’d actually presented a shred of evidence that doesn’t require believing known liars as a prerequisite.