This is more of a 2 part question. Should child porn that does not include a real child be illegal? If so, who is being harmed by it?

The other question is; does giving a pedophile access to “imitation” children give them an outlet for their desire, so they won’t try to engage with real children, or does it just reinforce their desire, thus helping them to rationalize their behavior and lead to them being more encouraged to harm real children?

I’ve heard psychologists discuss both sides, but I don’t think we have any real life studies to go off of because the technology is so new.

I’m just curious what the other thought out there are from people who are more liberty minded.

  • MentalEdge
    link
    English
    2
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You didn’t read my comment. I want nothing to do with fucking criminals. Stop suggesting otherwise, you lunatic.

    Stop trying to put words in my mouth. It’s not gonna work, especially if you won’t even read and understand what I am actually trying to say.

    Responding like this, anyone who reads our exchange is gonna look at your responses, and determine you’re the crazy one, because what you are saying makes no fucking sense in response to me if you actually read and understand what I’m saying. Is that what you want?

    • Maharashtra
      link
      English
      01 year ago

      You didn’t read my comment.

      You didn’t read mine. No wonder, given how self-absorbed you are…

      I want nothing to do with fucking criminals.

      Ah, so everything’s fine and dandy with ya, if they aren’t caught and sentenced? Brilliant strategy, milord!

      Now, I give you simple challenge: prove that you’re willing to set an example and coexist with those loathsome deviants you want for the society to embrace.

      If you can’t, if you don’t want to - admit that your ideas aren’t that good.

      • MentalEdge
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I did read yours. What makes you think otherwise?

        If someone who wants to kill, never does it, they shouldn’t be put in prison. They shouldn’t even be hated or feared.

        Someone who gets away with it, should be in prison. Someone who did kill, should be hated and feared.

        I will admit only one thing, that you refuse to understand what I’m actually trying to say.

        I wouldn’t need to prove shit, if you had the capacity to think clearly enough to understand, or even fucking read.

        • Maharashtra
          link
          English
          01 year ago

          I did read yours. What makes you think otherwise?

          The fact that you constantly avoid the challenge of proving your convictions true and correct.

          The other explanation is that you’re simply scared of it, or trolling, but I preferred to think you were simply too preoccupied with writing yet another comment. I don’t anymore.

          I wouldn’t need to prove shit

          Uh-huh. You absolutely has to do, since “burden of proof…” and all that.

          But you won’t. Because you realize how weak, irresponsible and “let this be other people’s problem” your train of logic is.

          Fgures.

          • MentalEdge
            link
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Except what you’re asking me to prove I believe, isn’t actually what I believe, because you refuse to even think about what I am actually saying.

            You’ve made assumptions, and because those assumptions are so heinously evil, you won’t even consider what I have to say.

            Because you’re acting based on assumptions, you keep missing when trying to dismantle my argument, because its not my argument you’re attacking, but your imagined idea of what I’m saying.

            So here we are, going in circles, me trying to get through to you, you accusing me of avoiding the point, because I keep trying to force you to see my actual point, instead of the imagined one that you’ve fixated on.

            • Maharashtra
              link
              English
              01 year ago

              If you were honest about your philosophy, you’d seek some way to prove it - and yourself - to be solid, logical and, well, honest.

              But you’re not. You’re looking for explanations, excuses, ways to divert the discussion, distractions, and finally insults. Like an undereducated AIs guided by inflexible software.

              There’s no way in hell that you’re going to ever take the responsibility for your choices and suggestions. Because all you have in store is a bunch of idiotic ideas that are supposed to be "other poeople’s burden.

              Would that be all?

              • MentalEdge
                link
                English
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I see you’re a broken record now, attempting yet another character assassination instead of dismantling my argument. Nothing of what I’ve said allows you to draw the conclusions about me that you are presenting. It’s disgraceful.

                If anything, you’ve made it even more certain that anyone else coming across this exchange, won’t take your side. Good job.

                You’re the one avoiding the real discussion.

                I bet that even if I did provide the proof you are asking for, you’d find some way to invalidate it and require more. It’s a classic arguing tactic among the brainless. So many times I’ve backed myself up with salient points, including now, only for them to be utterly ignored.

                Who cares if you’re wrong? If you keep claiming to be right, at least it feels like there’s still a chance that you are.

                But there isn’t. You’re wrong.

                That will be all.

                • Maharashtra
                  link
                  English
                  0
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I see you’re a broken record now,

                  Yes. There’s no merit in a discussion where one side pushes possibly troubling, hurtful propaganda and ideals, while not being ready to actually back them up with actions, thus setting an example that it can be done, that it’s not that bad. Much like every dictator ever demands for others to make it happen.

                  You’re wrong.

                  Feel free to prove it in real word, Internet dictator.

                  That will be all.

                  It was over long ago.

                  • MentalEdge
                    link
                    English
                    1
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    It was over the moment you didn’t read my comment, and responded with nonsense. Ever since, I’ve been trying to get you to admit that mistake, so we could have a real discussion.

                    By demanding action, you sidestep the actual exchange of ideas. Because online, here in a thread of mere text, ideas and the words that represent them, is all we have. By demanding action, you avoid having to defend your own views at all. You’ve made yourself look utterly devoid of reason to anyone capable of realising that. Which is everyone with their head on straight.

                    I’d need to be a mod to be a dictator, so I could ban you. Instead I’m right here on your level, trying to use words to explain why you’re wrong. I demand nothing from you, except the basic ability to fucking read. You’re the one demanding the literally impossible. That I bring grand actions as ideological proof, into a fucking anonymous text thread.

                    You just need to scroll the fuck up, and fucking read what I had to say. You’re still responding as if I think something I don’t. You’re afraid of understanding what I have to say, that you might agree with me if you did, so afraid that you wont take off your beer goggles and look at reality with clear eyes. You’d rather appear insane to anyone watching than risk reality proving you wrong.