This is more of a 2 part question. Should child porn that does not include a real child be illegal? If so, who is being harmed by it?

The other question is; does giving a pedophile access to “imitation” children give them an outlet for their desire, so they won’t try to engage with real children, or does it just reinforce their desire, thus helping them to rationalize their behavior and lead to them being more encouraged to harm real children?

I’ve heard psychologists discuss both sides, but I don’t think we have any real life studies to go off of because the technology is so new.

I’m just curious what the other thought out there are from people who are more liberty minded.

  • El Barto
    link
    English
    11 year ago

    Ah, sorry. We don’t disagree, then.

    If someone fucks a fleshlight, some religious people might see it as immoral, but in the end, they’re just fucking an object.

    Give the fleshlight the shape of a doll, and then the same people who didn’t have a problem before, all of a sudden they do. Why? I surely don’t want my fleshlights to look like kids, but I won’t judge anybody who do - and never harms actual kids in any way.

    (Can companies make sex dolls that look like Margot Robbie already, please?)

    • @HappycamperNZ
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      Id like one that looks like a cardio bunny… especially if they can spot me as well. Double bonus.