• NABDad
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s kind of a shame. If only Hugh Hefner knew any journalists or publishers. They could have done an exposé.

    Not blaming Hugh for Epstein’s crimes, but…did it not even occur to him?

    • whereitsat@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 month ago

      why was it his responsibility? he passed the knowledge onto the proper authorities. he did the right thing.

      maybe he didn’t want to jeopardize an investigation by publishing hearsay. maybe he thought they were investigating.

      what a silly comment. lol @ the upvotes.

      • NABDad
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I would argue that it was his responsibility as a publisher. Otherwise, what’s the point of hiring journalists?

        The reason a free press is important in a democracy is to hold the proper authorities responsible when they don’t do their job.

      • NABDad
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        But why wouldn’t he just do something like, “Hey Bob (or whoever), put someone on the Epstein story. Someone who can do some digging.”

        • Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          Same reason nobody else really has, they’re vicious gangsters, they kill innocent people. If they rape children en masse they have no qualms killing an investigator.

    • BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m not sure people would had respected a piece of proper journalism published in PlayBoy