This Shouldn't Still Be So Hard
tilvids.com
Today I talk about Debian's 'improvements' to their website and why they're still not good enough. 👇 PULL IT DOWN FOR THE GOOD STUFF 👇 Patreon - https://patreon.com/thelinuxcast Paypal - https://paypal.me/thelinuxcast Youtube - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCylGUf9BvQooEFjgdNudoQg/join Ko-fi - https://ko-fi.com/thelinuxcast ===== Follow us 🐧🐧 ====== Discord - https://discord.gg/bPJ4A3bPbV Odysee - https://odysee.com/#x2F;invite/@thelinuxcast:4 TILvids(Peertube) - https://tilvids.com/c/thelinuxcast_channel/videos Mastodon- https://fosstodon.org/@thelinuxcast https://gitlab.com/thelinuxcast Matrix - https://matrix.to/#/#the-linux-cast:matrix.org The Website http://thelinuxcast.org Contact us [email protected] Amazon Wishlist - https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/1J3W9HF4O2M7T?ref_=wl_share Logo Courtesy of - pedropaulo.net Intro Courtesy of - https://www.fragcgi.com/?i=1 ==== Special Thanks to Our Patrons! ==== https://thelinuxcast.org/patrons/ ==== Referenced ==== https://debian.org #debian #linux #thelinuxcast

TLDW from ChatGPT:

The video is a critique of the Debian Linux distribution’s website and its user experience, primarily focusing on the difficulties in finding and downloading the appropriate ISO images. The presenter praises Debian’s stability and community but criticizes the website’s design, stating that it’s not user-friendly, especially for new Linux users. The video highlights how the website layout, multiple clicks, and confusing file tree structure can make it challenging to locate the desired ISO images, particularly for the live installer versions. The presenter suggests that while improvements have been made, the ISO download process can still be convoluted and feels like the distribution is not encouraging new users. The overall message conveys a desire for Debian to make its ISOs more easily accessible and user-friendly.

    • @[email protected]
      1•1 year ago

      So does why not debían and or fedora develop this feature and contribute it back to calamares?

      Admittedly I don’t know the details of the situation here. But rather than spend the development hours maintaining their own bad installer, why don’t they put them into contributing to this arguably better shared project?

      • @[email protected]
        3•1 year ago

        Because it’s not their responsibility to add a feature people primarily use on servers to an installer built for desktop usage. Because there installer isn’t bad, it’s loved exactly for the ability to automate it. Because their installer works, and it doesn’t take a lot of manpower. According to debian salsa, it basically only receives translations and package updates, some of that automated.

        Why have the debian devs go off and add support a whole another installer (by support I mean actually attempt to add features to it) when they have a perfectly nice, working installer? The devs have more important things to do.