He literally says the line is rational discussion because if they won’t do that it might lead to violence.
No, he does not. You’re misinterpreting the word “may” used in this context and time period.
I can see very clearly why you’re not interested in having an actual conversation about tolerance… while you are literally in a thread about tolerance.
Your last reply you tried to call me disingenuous and say that I was projecting my beliefs. Instead of bastardizing Poppers works chatting with AI to try to make yourself look as if you have an education on the topic, I suggest signing up for a few classes.
If nothing else, at least get the AI to explain your misunderstanding of the word “may” in that single little snippet of text you are so in love with before you bother replying again.
I can see very clearly why you’re not interested in having an actual conversation about tolerance… while you are literally in a thread about tolerance
I thought we were in a thread about a popper quote? Because I’m pretty sure I replied to someone saying it was misinterpreted.
I said your phrasing was disingenuous because you characterized the position of people you disagree with in a dismissive fashion. I said you were projecting your opinion because instead of saying “I disagree with this person” you chose to say “they are actually saying what I think and are just generally misunderstood”.
No, he does not. You’re misinterpreting the word “may” used in this context and time period.
I can see very clearly why you’re not interested in having an actual conversation about tolerance… while you are literally in a thread about tolerance.
Your last reply you tried to call me disingenuous and say that I was projecting my beliefs. Instead of bastardizing Poppers works chatting with AI to try to make yourself look as if you have an education on the topic, I suggest signing up for a few classes.
If nothing else, at least get the AI to explain your misunderstanding of the word “may” in that single little snippet of text you are so in love with before you bother replying again.
I thought we were in a thread about a popper quote? Because I’m pretty sure I replied to someone saying it was misinterpreted.
I said your phrasing was disingenuous because you characterized the position of people you disagree with in a dismissive fashion. I said you were projecting your opinion because instead of saying “I disagree with this person” you chose to say “they are actually saying what I think and are just generally misunderstood”.