• Tiral
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Right? Yeah … 51%ish people voted for him, and if you didn’t vote at all, then you helped cause it. Not that I think Kamala wasn’t a lying piece of shit, but I’d rather have 4 years of stagnation than 4 years of what we’re getting.

    TBH I think the Democrats have it in the bag next election if they provide someone remotely competent. The die hard Trumpies will always vote right, but I think a lot of people were on the fence will go left as a knee jerk reaction.

    • zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      He did not get the majority of votes. He got the most votes. There is a difference and the former highlights one of the flaws in our electoral system.

    • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I think the Democrats have it in the bag next election if they provide someone remotely competent.

      I don’t. Because they have. Oh, not progressives that I want, but remotely competent? Yes.

      Who owns the media? Why do republicans get passes and democrats don’t? It’s pretty damned pervasive propaganda on nearly every front.

      Sure, dems could do better, but anyone they run gets relentless attacks at every level.

      So that’s why I disagree with your statement. heh