After his nomination by Trump, Kennedy initially said he intended to keep a 10% fee of any settlement involving Gardasil cases he referred to the Wisner Baum law firm, which has represented dozens of plaintiffs. Met with concerns from Democratic U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and other lawmakers during the confirmation process, Kennedy then said he would hand over his financial interest in vaccine litigation to a son.
Last month, the senators asked whether Kennedy’s son received the health secretary’s share of the Gardasil fees, and if so, how much money that represents. They wanted answers to why Kennedy did not commit to recuse himself from U.S. health agency decisions involving Gardasil, or other policymaking around vaccine litigation.
In response, Kennedy said in a social media post earlier this month, that neither he nor anyone else in his family have “received a penny” from the Gardasil settlement. Before taking office, Kennedy said he “relinquished any interest in potential Gardasil fees back to the Wisner Baum law firm.”
In the letter on Monday, Warren and three other lawmakers pointed to Kennedy’s ethics filings and written answers provided to the Senate Finance Committee last year, in which the secretary said he would hand any Gardasil fees to his son. The senators’ staff could find no subsequent filings with different information, the letter said.
Kennedy’s recent statement, the letter said, appears to indicate the information he previously provided “is no longer accurate and suggests that you have either modified your ethics agreement or strayed from it altogether.”


Pretty sure Trump made the same claim but just didn’t do anything because “no one stopped” him.
I’m saying giving the money to an immediate family member doesn’t absolve you of an ethical violation.
If receiving personally receiving money would influence you unethically, giving that money to your KID does not absolve you of a personal interest.
Have I gone mad?
Nah you right, giving the bribe money to my kid or spouse is still going to corrupt my neutrality.
I guess they’re mainly pointing out that he’s straying from his agreement, not that the agreement was well crafted to prevent corruption.
Imagine reading that congress was upset because a politician was raping children, only to find out in the article that what they were really upset about was that the politician testified to congress during their confirmation hearing that they were only going to rape their OWN children.
We’ve completely lost the plot when we’re confirming people who openly admit to ethical violations. All congress is doing here is trying to pretend that the congress matters, that’s what this is about: Kennedy said something to congress and he didn’t do it. Congress doesn’t care what he said he would do is baldly unethical, they just don’t want to be lied to; this is about pretending congress has an authority it clearly has long ago forsaken. It is theater.
Anyway, I promised myself I’d touch grass an hour ago and my dog is increasingly in agreement with this decision.
I agree, this is mostly performative drivel. Pat your dog for me and absorb the symmetry of a leaf.
I looked into it, and some leaves are more symmetrical than others, by tree and by type.
I wasn’t disagreeing.