The danger is they come to depend on it, and then it fails. I suppose though, this can happen with any procedure. And, with the outcome being immediately apparent, it’s less likely to be a mistake they’ll make often.
Come to think of it, I suppose the greater danger is the doctors losing control of the decision process. With money taking over. Again, a danger in any case.
AI assisted research and for situations like this, where it’s just pointing out something human eyes might have missed, seem like a decent use of AI. Not all AI use is bad, but the good use cases are far, far fewer than what techbros are selling. The tech is NOT reliable enough to take humans out of the loop. And, probably the current iteration never will be. A different approach is needed, not further refinement of this, apparently unfixable approach.
Man that bubble burst is gonna be huge. They done fucked up big time. Greed and impatience, FOMO.
The danger is they come to depend on it, and then it fails. I suppose though, this can happen with any procedure. And, with the outcome being immediately apparent, it’s less likely to be a mistake they’ll make often.
Come to think of it, I suppose the greater danger is the doctors losing control of the decision process. With money taking over. Again, a danger in any case.
AI assisted research and for situations like this, where it’s just pointing out something human eyes might have missed, seem like a decent use of AI. Not all AI use is bad, but the good use cases are far, far fewer than what techbros are selling. The tech is NOT reliable enough to take humans out of the loop. And, probably the current iteration never will be. A different approach is needed, not further refinement of this, apparently unfixable approach.
Man that bubble burst is gonna be huge. They done fucked up big time. Greed and impatience, FOMO.