• 20cello
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Yeah,you just gotta inform 2 billions people living with a few dollars a month. Totally realistic

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s a slow process, but possible.

      And living with a few dollars a month will be easier if you don’t have kids. Kids are expensive.

      • 20cello
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s a slow process, but possible.

        This might work in first world countries

        living with a few dollars a month will be easier if you don’t have kids.

        For a large part of the humanity raising kids is a way to survive, grown up children,little more than toddlers sometimes, help their families avoid starvation. They haven’t the privilege to choose.

        • OwOarchist@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          And then those children will need to have children to survive when they grow up. And so on with their children, and so on with their children’s children… A never-ending cycle of creating more suffering to alleviate your own.

          Time to make the selfless choice, tough it out without children, and break the cycle. It will be worse for you, but better for countless future generations who won’t have to deal with it anymore.

          • 20cello
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            5 days ago

            That choice is just impossible to make at a global level