@MicroWave to News • edit-21 year agoAutonomous AI-Generated Artwork Cannot Be Copyrighted, Judge Ruleswww.rollingstone.comexternal-linkmessage-square31arrow-up1219arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up1217arrow-down1external-linkAutonomous AI-Generated Artwork Cannot Be Copyrighted, Judge Ruleswww.rollingstone.com@MicroWave to News • edit-21 year agomessage-square31file-text
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink8•1 year agoWhat if I were to create a training model made exclusively from my own artwork. It would only be reassembling my work, so would that not be copyrighteable? I wonder how that would be handled in the future.
minus-square@SheeEttinlink7•1 year agoBecause you’re not generating the output. I’m not sure I agree with this position, but that’s the reasoning.
minus-square@schroedingershatlinkEnglish3•1 year agoIf that were the case, a compiled program is not copyrightable.
What if I were to create a training model made exclusively from my own artwork. It would only be reassembling my work, so would that not be copyrighteable?
I wonder how that would be handled in the future.
Because you’re not generating the output.
I’m not sure I agree with this position, but that’s the reasoning.
If that were the case, a compiled program is not copyrightable.
Oh I love this take