@[email protected]M to Murdered by [email protected] • 2 years agoMurdered by numbers.feddit.ukimagemessage-square65fedilinkarrow-up11.03Karrow-down138
arrow-up1993arrow-down1imageMurdered by numbers.feddit.uk@[email protected]M to Murdered by [email protected] • 2 years agomessage-square65fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-5•2 years agothat’s what I meant. You wouldn’t give them to whoever not needed them. I called them man, you called them people without uterus. In other words, you don’t want to treat all equally.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-1•2 years ago there’s no equivalence here. So you would give menstrual products to people with a uterus but don’t say anything about not giving menstrual products to people without a uterus? But would you? If you do not, wouldn’t that make you treat people unequally, in some sense?
that’s what I meant. You wouldn’t give them to whoever not needed them. I called them man, you called them people without uterus. In other words, you don’t want to treat all equally.
deleted by creator
So you would give menstrual products to people with a uterus but don’t say anything about not giving menstrual products to people without a uterus?
But would you? If you do not, wouldn’t that make you treat people unequally, in some sense?
deleted by creator
Removed by mod