Asking this because i’m a newbie in the topic of socialism and i want to understand whether China is actually considerable socialist or not. A lot of the stuff we see are Chinese brands, owned by privates (at least i think so, correct me if i’m wrong), making tons of capital. So what’s actually going on?

  • JaderickBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    8 days ago

    Removed by mod

    • freagle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      Literally for at least 100 years the word “socialism” has been used to mean the process of transition from capitalism to communism guided by a communist party.

      China is a socialist country because it meets that definition.

      It is authoritarian because it is a state. All states are authoritarian, by definition.

      It is state capitalist because that’s what happens when a state guides a transition to communism within a capitalist world order.

      And it’s called the Communist Party of China, not the Chinese Communist Party, because it is named in the tradition of all Communist Parties - CPUSA (Communist Party of the USA), PCC (Party Communista de Cuba), CPV (Communist Party of Vietnam), etc

      • Digit@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I suspect it’d be a fun waving path drawn by their point on the political compass… not entirely in one direction consistently.

      • Buhbyelittlegumshoe@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Authoritarian PLUS state capitalism is what, a combo of trot and anarchist jargon? Using it says they haven’t properly investigated the topic and are just repeating comfortable compatible left narratives