If I would mock our president, is this suddenly misandry? Sounds like something he would accuse me of.
"I think we are ready to release the files, terribly named, and bury them under the America Pyramid, wouldn’t that be nice.
“Epstein is a terrible name, so I say we are going to call them the America Files, and use a pyramid like the Arabs like to do. And people can come and see the America Pyramids, and you know, I think in 3000 years, maybe 10000 years, they will wonder what we, the American public, were seeking to accomplish.”
Next time just say “You’re dumb” rather than beat around the bush; be concise, don’t be passive-aggressive.
Here’s why you don’t appear to know what “misogyny” means:
You defend the suspicion of misogyny by stating you don’t care about her, which is mostly irrelevant but arguably slight proof against you; the latter because it could be you don’t care about her because she’s a woman, but you haven’t revealed that (yet).
What in the misogyny?..
What misogyny?
If I would mock our president, is this suddenly misandry? Sounds like something he would accuse me of.
"I think we are ready to release the files, terribly named, and bury them under the America Pyramid, wouldn’t that be nice.
“Epstein is a terrible name, so I say we are going to call them the America Files, and use a pyramid like the Arabs like to do. And people can come and see the America Pyramids, and you know, I think in 3000 years, maybe 10000 years, they will wonder what we, the American public, were seeking to accomplish.”
Nope.
Nope what? Who asked a question?
Nope there was no misogyny? Cool, same page.
You did:
Then I ignored the rant that followed because it was waste.
rofl, I think you meant disregard. This is cheesing me out with your disdainful approach to basic communication.
You see, you accused me of misogyny over a person I don’t care about, and do not know why anyone cares about.
Rather than validating her, you attacked me, while pretending you were taking some sort of higher ground.
So damn funny!
I don’t think you know what “misogyny” means.
… I don’t think you know what “think” means.
Next time just say “You’re dumb” rather than beat around the bush; be concise, don’t be passive-aggressive.
Here’s why you don’t appear to know what “misogyny” means:
You defend the suspicion of misogyny by stating you don’t care about her, which is mostly irrelevant but arguably slight proof against you; the latter because it could be you don’t care about her because she’s a woman, but you haven’t revealed that (yet).
You do realize the definition of ignore, right?
So agreeing to willful ignorance?