• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    01 year ago

    His entire train of thought is based on the idea that “Lincoln didn’t oppose slavery” which is “technically correct.” Except it leaves out all historical analysis which allows him to come to the fallacious conclusion that “the civil war wasn’t about slavery.”

    • GladiusB
      link
      11 year ago

      Wars aren’t one person. Even the President.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes, this was literally my entire point. Did you miss this?

        His conclusion rests on the assumption that in a war, two sides must be diametrically opposed to one another, so if Lincoln and the north were not fighting against slavery, therefore the south could not be fighting for slavery.

        Edit: if you need it spelled out, I am implying that this is a fallacious assumption

        Edit 2: to spell it out further, I am implying this is a fallacious assumption based in part on the reason you just laid out

        • GladiusB
          link
          -61 year ago

          Then you need you access your writing capabilities. Your initial response was he was “technically correct”. He is not technically correct. He’s technically stretching the truth to match click bait on a garbage platform and spew anti racism rhetoric.

          Lincoln was not the only person fighting the Civil War. There were hundreds of thousands. You disrespect every soldier that died and for their causes by reducing it to two people making choices.

          I took History of the United States. As an undergrad. With an emphasis on the time period. Slavery was very much part of the landscape for every single American. It is utterly inept to even try and justify it otherwise.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Most people who read my original comment seemed to have no issues with it. You however should work on your reading comprehension if you came away from it thinking that it’s justifying slavery.

            Did Lincoln want to outlaw slavery? Maybe we can begin there.

            I straight up don’t even know what the fuck you’re talking about in the rest of this comment. Or rather, I don’t know how it’s responding in any way to my original comment.

            • GladiusB
              link
              -51 year ago

              Then take a more comprehensive English course and don’t respond until you do.

                • GladiusB
                  link
                  -11 year ago

                  Are you asking for advice if you do? We still love you. You be you boo.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -11 year ago

                    I’m honestly concerned for your health. You seem to lack the ability to comprehend basic written English, and nearly all of your comments are rife with word salad completely unrelated to anything I’ve written. You either have some sort of brain damage, or you’ve really misjudged your own intelligence, reading comprehension, and ability to communicate using the written word