You are kind of all over the place. Let’s get back to what was said.
I drew a comparison between an actual criminal who caused real deaths and hundreds of millions of dollars in damages with a fictional scenario of a person non-violently robbing a store saying they had a gun and getting a twenty year sentence for getting away with $200.
In real life she is already in a halfway house… Its barely been 2 fucking years! Are you one of these lunatics who wants to see her in a future role in the administration? Considering she just asked Trump to let her go and now she got this sweet new deal. You got my wheels spinning bro!
At any rate the amount of crimes she committed combined with the loss of life just fucking blows this out of the water. No question and a perfect example of our two-tiered justice system, which based on your obvious bias against blue collar crime, is alive and well. Cheers!
No question and a perfect example of our two-tiered justice system, which based on your obvious bias against blue collar crime, is alive and well.
Lol. You’re the one that brought blue collar crime into the discussion in the first place. There’s no defense of the two tier bullshit farm here. Even though you seem to be stuck on that for whatever reason.
I pointed out that bringing a crime involving gun violence into the discussion as a comparison made no sense. For whatever reason you keep trying to defend that initial choice as if it somehow is a relevant comparison at all.
I now understand why you’re not getting why we’re still having this discussion despite being on the same side of the argument. You were trying to point out the two tier justice system as the issue… but you chose to bring a violent crime into the discussion for that when it wasn’t necessary, and just deflected the conversation towards that.
You could have picked any number of other non-violent crimes to compare against if your focus was on the two-tier system, but you chose to direct it towards violence for that comparison. And when that was pointed out, you doubled down on the choice.
Not going to bother anymore here since you still can’t seem to figure out that’s what was being disputed from the beginning, not whether the two tier system exists.
You are kind of all over the place. Let’s get back to what was said.
I drew a comparison between an actual criminal who caused real deaths and hundreds of millions of dollars in damages with a fictional scenario of a person non-violently robbing a store saying they had a gun and getting a twenty year sentence for getting away with $200.
In real life she is already in a halfway house… Its barely been 2 fucking years! Are you one of these lunatics who wants to see her in a future role in the administration? Considering she just asked Trump to let her go and now she got this sweet new deal. You got my wheels spinning bro!
At any rate the amount of crimes she committed combined with the loss of life just fucking blows this out of the water. No question and a perfect example of our two-tiered justice system, which based on your obvious bias against blue collar crime, is alive and well. Cheers!
Lol. You’re the one that brought blue collar crime into the discussion in the first place. There’s no defense of the two tier bullshit farm here. Even though you seem to be stuck on that for whatever reason.
I pointed out that bringing a crime involving gun violence into the discussion as a comparison made no sense. For whatever reason you keep trying to defend that initial choice as if it somehow is a relevant comparison at all.
That is literally what a two tiered justice system is. Blue collar crime and white collar crime. Welcome to the discussion my friend.
What is this… Are you okay?
Only because that is what we are talking about. Seriously, you stroking out on me.
Bro, gun violence is blue collar crime and fraud is white collar crime. The two tiered justice system remember…
Help me.
I now understand why you’re not getting why we’re still having this discussion despite being on the same side of the argument. You were trying to point out the two tier justice system as the issue… but you chose to bring a violent crime into the discussion for that when it wasn’t necessary, and just deflected the conversation towards that.
You could have picked any number of other non-violent crimes to compare against if your focus was on the two-tier system, but you chose to direct it towards violence for that comparison. And when that was pointed out, you doubled down on the choice.
Not going to bother anymore here since you still can’t seem to figure out that’s what was being disputed from the beginning, not whether the two tier system exists.