I read your link, and all it talks about, in its two paragraphs, is ‘Matt Damon is white’ (white looking Mexicans don’t exist apparently) and that ‘it didn’t rouse people up sufficiently, therefore it’s bad propaganda’.
Matt is white and the movie is not good as a movie.
I mentioned in my reply that even liberals came with a conclusion about the no point of the movie and it is swinging towards cringe holywood narratives.
The guy writing the article shifted to identity politics which is something i really dont care about, but he is true about the end message being “no message” except centric dogma that everything is fine and
“robots will save us humans, yay lets have brunch together “
Really? I didn’t get that at all. I was wondering, after that ending, when would the committees form and the executions begin a la 1917.
I mean even liberals came with the same conclusion as many class consciousness critics
That should tells you something about how bad the movie went.
The false message of that movie
I read your link, and all it talks about, in its two paragraphs, is ‘Matt Damon is white’ (white looking Mexicans don’t exist apparently) and that ‘it didn’t rouse people up sufficiently, therefore it’s bad propaganda’.
Matt is white and the movie is not good as a movie.
I mentioned in my reply that even liberals came with a conclusion about the no point of the movie and it is swinging towards cringe holywood narratives.
The guy writing the article shifted to identity politics which is something i really dont care about, but he is true about the end message being “no message” except centric dogma that everything is fine and
What centrist dogma? That the proletariat should rise and capture the means of power?
Again, the ending had no brunches, it was basically the start of a violent retribution against the bourgeoisie.