• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -631 year ago

    Lennart has always been a joke. Forced systems on us and wrote the disaster of pulseaudio.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -311 year ago

        After being a pile of crap forced on us by a corporate giant for many many years. Make no mistake, they are doing embrace extend extinguish just like Microsoft.

    • 2xsaiko
      link
      fedilink
      451 year ago

      I use Pipewire now but Pulseaudio is (and has been for years) better than both the Windows and Mac audio stack. It may have been bad once (yes, I remember the days of having to start Wine with some pulse env var so the audio doesn’t crackle) but nowadays it doesn’t deserve the level of hate it still gets.

      • @warmaster
        link
        131 year ago

        Wasn’t Red hat also responsible for Pipewire and Wayland?

        I love to hate them for what they did recently, but those two projects kick major ass.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -28
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It would have been fine if it wasn’t forced. “We are the audio stack everyone should use” but when it doesn’t work then it’s an ALSA bug and alsa ppl should take the blame (even when it works fine with full alsa, like my audio card). And it was designed more like a networking stack then an audio stack.

        Sure it was necessary at the time (so that hdmi, and later bluetooth, would work transparently), but the “i know best” attitude hurt its execution.

        SystemD on the other hand brought nothing of value. Did way more harm then good.

        • Pasta Dental
          link
          fedilink
          421 year ago

          Quit your bullshit, nothing was ever forced on you. This is Linux, free software and all that, if you’re not happy then use a systemd-less distro and stop complaining about meaningless points. SystemD works very well for me (and the vast majority of the Linux community) and is very easy to use and understand

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            221 year ago

            This. If you want to go back to the days without systemd and writing invit scripts manually, knock yourselves out. The rest of us will continue to live in the modern world of systemd, pulse audio (and now pipe wire).

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -16
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Udev was changed to depend on systemd. No good reason for it. So it practically was forced. You can lie all you want, it won’t change reality. SystemD was hyped up by comparing it with the worst implementation of sysV, at a time when no major distro other then fedora even used sysV. And that is not even the tip of the pile of dishonesty.

            Just by saying that it is no better then alternatives of the time will get ignorant people like you to yell. That is how strong the hype was around it. How can you even talk about free software when RH can take a core component and make it hard dependant on whatever they want. Just like bluetooth has a hard dependency on PA. I’m also free to say something sucks, just like you are free to lick their balls.

            • @woelkchen
              link
              7
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Use Devuan and quit whining.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -12
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                It always was about feelings with you fanboys. Pathetic.

                PS I wouldn’t mind using systemD, it’s the same as every other. Functionally absolutely the same.

                • @ozymandias117
                  link
                  English
                  41 year ago

                  As someone currently actively supporting two commercial products, one using OpenRC and one using systemd to meet different requirements for different projects

                  Functionally absolutely the same

                  Makes it blatantly obvious you have no idea what you’re saying

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    0
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    As someone who wrote an init system for fun and knows how udev and practically everything else associated with bringing a modern computer to a fully functional state (including network mounts, if that is your nitpick) works, i can not know what you are nitpicking about without you saying it. Not that someone who is actively supporting two commercial products to meet different requirements would have any idea what i am saying.

                    PS It’s all simple really, just that it seems magic to people without curiosity.

      • monk
        link
        fedilink
        341 year ago

        Linux community is so inherently meritocratic that one can’t meaninfully force anything upon any large group of them.

        Thore particular two creations of Lennart took the world by storm precisely because they were so absurdly good that working on other stuff was a dead-end, obvious for all but such tiny fraction of people that even forming vacuous hate bubbles haven’t rallied enough effort to foster and maintain alternatives.

        It became trendy to hate Pulseaudio and call it bloat years after Nokia shipped a rather anemic phone where it already worked flawlessly. I need no further proof that there’s no technical basis beneath the hate.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          Linux community is so inherently meritocratic that one can’t meaningfully force anything upon any large group of them.

          Even for developers, there is a very substantial cost to any deviation from the herd and little time or money for these projects. Factually a handful of companies run the Linux userspace and a handful of people run those companies.

          You can go your own way but existing market share and resources matter more than quality or merit.

          • monk
            link
            fedilink
            81 year ago

            As a Red Hat employee who had his all-around sensible Fedora Change to prevent it from falling too far behind RHEL (!) rejected, I think I can confidently claim that your statements smell of conspiracy theories.

            Do Linux-involved companies have resources to develop the projects they like the most? Yes. Do companies dominate userspace development? I don’t think so, in fact, they’re all seem quite focused in their interests, and their involvement with a median package on your community distro desktop system isn’t even minimal, it’s none. Do the se companies at least all push for a united agenda? Absolutely not. Can they force a single random community distro like Debian to pick something over something else? No. 99% of the distros? Goes without saying.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              61 year ago

              It’s not a conspiracy theory to imagine that IBM’s vision for Linux compared to 2000s or 2010s era Linux is opaque, complicated, and enterprisey. It’s who they are.

              The grandparent comment

              Linux community is so inherently meritocratic that one can’t meaningfully force anything upon any large group of them.

              Is pure fantasy. Software projects are dictatorships of those willing to put in the work, not meritocracies. There is nothing immoral or wrong about this but we should be realists. The entire software ecosystem is dominated by oft shitty good enough solutions which people poured enough work into to solve problems well enough.

              • monk
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                IBM’s vision

                Anybody can have a vision, but it’s the work that matters. I’ll be worried when they become a player.

                Software projects are dictatorships of those willing to put in the work, not meritocracies.

                Most linux distros are slight variations on the best components available. Yes, one can put in resources, do a great job and now everyone switches to the fruits of their labor. No, it does nothing to stop another player from one-upping them and taking the lead with their next best good enough. In political terms, dictatorships are incompatible with voting with one’s feet.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  Anybody can have a vision, but it’s the work that matters. I’ll be worried when they become a player.

                  Did you entirely miss the part where IBM bought Red Hat

                  • monk
                    link
                    fedilink
                    11 year ago

                    It was hard to miss, I was working there. It doesn’t mean that much as you’re assuming.