@[email protected] to > [email protected] • 1 year agoAnon gets his iPhone battery replacedsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square142fedilinkarrow-up11.49Karrow-down144
arrow-up11.45Karrow-down1imageAnon gets his iPhone battery replacedsh.itjust.works@[email protected] to > [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square142fedilink
minus-square@Adolink-1•1 year agoWhy is that sad? I can understand why companies don’t want to pay just to get a certification when the phone itself is up to standards regardless
minus-squarekamenlinkEnglish4•1 year ago“It’s easier to make the phone waterproof if the battery is not user-serviceable” is a common argument; if it’s really true, way more phones should be waterproof even if not IP-certified (which understandably costs money and raises the end price).
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoSamsung Galaxy S5 would like to have a word. IP67 while having user-detachable battery cover.
Why is that sad? I can understand why companies don’t want to pay just to get a certification when the phone itself is up to standards regardless
“It’s easier to make the phone waterproof if the battery is not user-serviceable” is a common argument; if it’s really true, way more phones should be waterproof even if not IP-certified (which understandably costs money and raises the end price).
deleted by creator
Samsung Galaxy S5 would like to have a word. IP67 while having user-detachable battery cover.
One of the very few phones like this.