Genuinely not trying to be obtuse, but I think a reading of “not all men” is what one could describe as not preemptively grouping yourself with them. It reads to me, perhaps naïvely, as drawing a line perhaps with that specific goal? No one disputes the existence of men, and “not all men” implies two groups, no?
What do you envision as a way to communicate a distinction such that you don’t suggest you’re not a man, but also say you’re not a rapist?
Genuinely not trying to be obtuse, but I think a reading of “not all men” is what one could describe as not preemptively grouping yourself with them. It reads to me, perhaps naïvely, as drawing a line perhaps with that specific goal? No one disputes the existence of men, and “not all men” implies two groups, no?
What do you envision as a way to communicate a distinction such that you don’t suggest you’re not a man, but also say you’re not a rapist?
Don’t rape others. Understand consent. Treat people with respect. Callout other men’s bad behavior.