So due to recent developments, are we still allowed to post and discuss tech-related topics? Or is the goal of this community now one of shitposting on LMG, given the recent name and banner changes?

The recent post on stubby screwdrivers was locked before even giving other people the opportunity to share their own thoughts on alternative brands that are specific to their country. As much as Linus and LMG fucked up, really sad to see this community degrading down a path of hatred (even if justified, based on community name change , banner, etc), instead of chatting about what we all love: technology, independent of the situation at LMG.

Really hate seeing a community with so much promise (especially as a Reddit alternative) getting destroyed.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    61 year ago

    I commend you if you are able to pursue a 100% ethical approach, but it’s also a bad take to expect everyone to follow that approach.

    The reality is that purchasing ethically is a luxury, and a first world problem. The power of brand choice is very much a luxury. You are assuming that everyone has the purchasing power of choosing ethical production. You can only do that if you have the means to choose and finances to pay. The majority of the world doesn’t have the fans financial means and have no choice but to purchase what they can afford, regardless of unethical production.

    If we don’t realize this unfortunate reality of the world, it only exacerbates unethical production even further, making it much harder to find ethically produced goods, as ethical products get more and more expensive due to demand, making people flock to unethically produced goods due to financial means.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      However, in this sepecific case, people who can afford a 250$ backpack, a 70$ screwdriver, and/or a 60$ fanny pack probably have the financial power to choose.

      As much as I am also upset that LTT related post is dis allowed here, I don’t feel like “people cannot afford ethical consumption” is a good argument against it.