My point is that the meme is nonsensical because it depends on “loving” meaning “won’t let animals be collateral damage.” Or since it asks why a god would kill “so much” animals, maybe it has a permissible threshold that isn’t mentioned. Either way, I’m officially past my not-worth-it-anymore threshold on this thread.
My point is that the meme is nonsensical because it depends on “loving” meaning “won’t let animals be collateral damage.” Or since it asks why a god would kill “so much” animals, maybe it has a permissible threshold that isn’t mentioned. Either way, I’m officially past my not-worth-it-anymore threshold on this thread.