• @Hazdaz
    link
    English
    -21 year ago

    And if I see CAD software, I will comment regardless of where the post is made. Simply brushing off the shittiness of the software just because it’s open is ridiculous. You realize that right? You shouldn’t be blindly defending something just because it is open. How is that beneficial?

    • Possibly linuxOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      It is not the “openness” that matters. What matters is the 4 freedoms. All of the tools you mentioned in your other comments don’t respect your freedom

      • @Hazdaz
        link
        English
        01 year ago

        How the hell does a useless tool that can’t allow me to do my work “respect my freedom”?!? How absurd are you going to take this?

        • Possibly linuxOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          It respects your freedom because you (and everyone else) have the ability to run, study, modify and distribute the source code.

          Please see the description of this sub for more information

          • @Hazdaz
            link
            English
            01 year ago

            You didn’t explain how a piece of software that DOESN’T allow me to do my work respect my freedom. It is just wasting people’s time and effort, and not respecting anything.

            Free =/= good

            And if the software isn’t at least good, then it is nearly useless.

            And the entire “free software” community is at fault for this because it doesn’t push developers to actually make good software. It’s like soviet Russian cars like the Trabant or Lada. Technically it is a car. Not a good one, but it is a car, so somehow we should be happy with what we got.