• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’ve got a few disagreements on this. I really swore I wouldn’t get into a 2A argument here.

    Properly executed defensive carry does not add much volatility

    Allegedly. We just don’t have enough school examples to know if that’s really the case.

    Making the primary response an assault team that needs to enter and clear the building adds complexity and volatility

    Except that (in non-dystopian situations) those assault teams will have dramatically more training. You are correct that breaching is more dangerous. That’s why I pitched a security team stationed inside schools. I don’t agree that, from a tactical point of view, you want that many disparate defenders who are not even part-time trained for that role.

    Gun control always results in a ban

    There are hundreds of countries that prove this wrong. A supermajority of countries in the world have gun control, and a near unanimity of those countries do not have absolute gun bans. I’m sure you can find a definition for the term “gun ban” where that’s the case (say, if any weapon is banned for any reason, you call it a gun ban), but there seems to be no evidence of a real slippery slope between gun control and gun bans. Guns can be strictly regulated without a ban, similar to how we strictly regulate alcohol.

    The US thankfully has it built into the Constitution as the fundamental right that it is

    This is also strictly incorrect, or at least incredibly nuanced. The 2nd Amendment does not add it as a fundamental right at all (Barron v. Baltimore, or merely the laws passed/defended by the very same people who penned and signed the Constitution). The 14th Amendment does add it as a fundamental right based around the Equal Rights clause (specifically, regarding Southern States banning guns from Black Americans and not White Americans). Despite SCOTUS being extremely creative (good and bad) with the 14th Amendment the last 40-50 years in general, there are still teeth to some gun control laws for that very reason. Prejudicial gun control is unconstitutional, but (on strict interpretation, not on how a future SCOTUS would rule) gun control with a defensible reason is not. Non-gun weapons

    • @theyoyomaster
      link
      11 year ago

      Fair enough, I’ll let you get on with your night. It was just refreshing to have someone genuinely willing to read and have a civil discourse. More than anything I just hope I was able to give you more perspective. It’s rare to change someone’s opinion outright but I have had surprising success many times with just the right nudge that started the thinking down a different path. Have a nice day.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Also fair enough. I acknowledge that the gun question is an incredibly complicated and nuanced one, and I think both extreme sides of it tend to oversimplify it in their own way. I’m definitely with you on that part.