• Madison420
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 days ago

    No one invaded Germany, correct. The aggressor is not entitled to self defense.

      • Madison420
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        Destruction of their industrial base and occupation of hostile territory.

        Nazis lost sovereignty when they invaded another sovereign nation. The aggressor is not entitled to self defense.

        • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 days ago

          Oh so you’re doing a legalistic thing. Okay, so if they had just done the Holocaust in their own borders, then anyone who crossed those borders to stop them would be an aggressor guilty of invasion, right?

          • Madison420
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 days ago

            It would be casus belli but yes that would be an invasion.

              • Madison420
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                9 days ago

                To stop the Holocaust? Sure.

                I get where you’re going and again I’m going to ask you to source your claim and we both know you can’t.

                  • Madison420
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    9 days ago

                    You’re going to claim they’re looking ethnic Russians. Am I wrong?

                    I imagine not but it does seem like it’ll be entertaining to watch you try to pull out of the flat spin you’ve put yourself in.