• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    541 year ago

    Good, it’s about time. Tritiated water just isn’t dangerous. The ocean naturally contains billions of tons of URANIUM. A few kilograms of short lived tritium isn’t going to matter at all.

    • @MeanEYE
      link
      English
      101 year ago

      Finally someone who understands it’s not as scary as news want it to sound like.

      • Carighan Maconar
        link
        English
        81 year ago

        I mean, it’s a lot of water they’re releasing.

        However, the water they’re releasing it into is a LOT of water.
        Maybe all the scare-people are homeopathy-lovers and hence think that the oceans will become utterly radioactive due to some water memory nonsense shit?

        • @MeanEYE
          link
          English
          111 year ago

          Always wondered about how homeopathy people don’t realize that all of the water in this world at one point went through someone’s ass. How come it doesn’t have a memory of that?

          • @kiwifoxtrot
            link
            English
            41 year ago

            That’s actually a selling point.

            • @MeanEYE
              link
              English
              31 year ago

              You could be right though. Secret fetish of thousands.

          • @betterdeadthanreddit
            link
            English
            41 year ago

            Nobody gave their ass-water the required number of magical shakes. Homeopathy predates twerking.

    • @finestnothing
      link
      English
      51 year ago

      Better yet, the water they’re releasing has less tritium in it than average ocean water, so releasing it will actually be an improvement for the ocean (190 vs avg of 500 of some unit)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        131 year ago

        Yep. Best estimate I have seen is 4.5 billion tons of uranium. Course, most of the natural radioactivity of our ocean is from potassium, actually. But either way, natural levels of radioactivity will not change.

      • @Slice
        link
        English
        111 year ago

        4 billion tons at 3 ppb… It’s so much water, don’t try to drink it either.

        • Gormadt
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          For anyone curious:

          From Wikipedia:

          The total mass of Earth’s hydrosphere is about 1.4 × 10^18 tonnes, which is about 0.023% of Earth’s total mass.

    • @jugalator
      link
      English
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This is what I’ve heard too. It’s really no big deal. Concerned local fishermen are probably just not introduced to the physics of this. In general, humans tend to worry a bit more about radioactivity than necessary. This in particular will be diluted into basically nothing. The only real problem is the PR work that lies ahead for them. In practice, their people should probably be more concerned about constantly dying early from pollution and protest more about that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        It’s not that the impact will be minimal, it is that it will not be present. It’s not that it’s possible that the release will be harmless. It’s a fact that it will be harmless. China and Korea are “raising concerns” because if they can economically punish the Japanese for being monsters during WW2 and the Japanese occupation of Korea, they will. And they’ll do that whether the water is properly released now or if we futz about for ten more years and THEN release it.