vice.com 25 Years Ago, an Episode of ‘Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?’ Landed 3 People in Jail Tony Alpsen 2–3 minutes

In September 2001, British Army Major Charles Ingram made two appearances on the original UK version of Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? Ingram didn’t do well initially, and used up two of his three lifelines by the end of the first show. However, he was able to turn things around by the next episode and managed to make it all the way to the final round, winning the top prize of £1 million.

Producers were immediately suspicious of Ingram’s victory, though, and reported him to the police. After reviewing the tapes, it was discovered that a series of coughs could be heard at crucial moments throughout the second episode, as Ingram was about to answer certain questions. Ingram’s wife, Diana, was even caught on camera seemingly coughing out the correct answer from the audience in one instance. Take a look for yourself right here:

Ingram never got his hands on the prize money and was accused of cheating with the help of his wife and Tecwen Whittock, who was in one of the nearby Fastest Finger First seats and coughed several times during the show. All three were subsequently arrested and questioned over the allegations prior to being released on bail. Whittock claimed he didn’t know the Ingrams, but phone records revealed that Diana had called him the night before her husband’s win.

In 2003, the trio were found guilty of procuring the execution of a valuable security through deception. The Ingrams received 18-month suspended jail sentences and were fined £15,000. Whittock, on the other hand, was given a 12-month suspended sentence and a £10,000 fine. Ingram was also asked to resign from the Army. They all continue to maintain their innocence.

You can check out the raw footage from Ingram’s appearances below.

  • danc4498
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    In 2003, the trio were found guilty of procuring the execution of a valuable security through deception.

    This sounds like a bullshit law. Gotta make some shit up to protect the game show owners?

    • RaoulDook
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s not limited to game shows, it’s ostensibly a law to prevent cheating and fraud in general

    • LePoisson
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s probably more to combat someone saying they have a bajillion dollars in collateral and they make up a bunch of fake shit to get a loan.

      I mean, I also find it silly they went after the folks on a tv show for cheating, but the law makes sense.

      • CrimeIsLegalNow@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        It was attempted fraud and theft. If you don’t care about stealing from mega corps that’s all well and good but at least be consistent about it for the sake of your own mental order.

    • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yes, we can’t have the plebes getting ahold of any kind of real money without the strict appearance of towing the line, and following the rules that don’t apply to the rich. Imagine the chaos that would have ensued had this man won the prize.

    • threeonefour@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      We’ll you’re in luck because this law, created in the Theft Act of 1978, was replaced with “fraud” in the Fraud Act of 2006.

      This Act largely replaces the laws relating to obtaining property by deception, obtaining a pecuniary advantage and other offences that were created under the Theft Act 1978. These offences attracted much criticism for their complexity and difficulty in proving at court.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraud_Act_2006