Better-received by experts, that is!

Or is the book actually well-regarded on the whole and still worth reading despite the criticisms? I’m not in a position to know, unfortunately, as I’m an uneducated schmuck.

Thank you!

  • discocactus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 days ago

    I mean he is an academic but not a historian. Came here to recommend those Mann books though, they’re excellent and he’s a better writer/researcher.