• AltMiisha ♀️
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Guess what, stupid? There are cis women who can’t give birth. And they’re still cis women, if you can even comprehend that with your narrow little mind.

    I’m wasting my time arguing with a bot…your comment history is a dead giveaway.

    • SpokeFace654@lemmy.todayBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      That’s not the same. Those cis women only have an error in the functioning.

        • SpokeFace654@lemmy.todayBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          A biological woman must at least have the theoretical ability to give birth.

          • Sarah Valentine@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 hours ago

            You haven’t proved you have the theoretical ability to think. By your logic that means you’re not a real person.

          • AltMiisha ♀️
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            “Theoretical ability to give birth”. You know…I don’t even think you know what you’re talking about yourself 😂

            So, you’re saying trans women aren’t women. Do I understand that correctly?

              • AltMiisha ♀️
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 hours ago

                Again, what does “biological woman” even mean? There are cis women born without uteruses. Are they “biological” women?

                There are people with XY chromosomes that are born with testicles (which don’t “drop” out of the body), but due to a condition called complete androgen insensitivity syndrome, they don’t respond to androgens at all.
                They develop female secondary sexual characteristics at puberty just like any cis woman and literally nobody can tell they have such a condition. Are those “biological” women, according to your logic?

                • SpokeFace654@lemmy.todayBanned from community
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  Those people are medical rarities. Not the same as a man transitioning to a woman, and then being called a biological female.

                  • AltMiisha ♀️
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    4 hours ago

                    You calling women “females” is honestly really telling. But sure, go on then, be a transphobic douchebag. You’re just gonna say something like “Oh I just have a different opinion than you!” anyway. Talking to you is a waste of time. Hope the mods remove you promptly.

                  • AltMiisha ♀️
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    4 hours ago

                    You do agree that trans women are women tho? Cause that’s what you said here.

                    Honestly I have no idea what you’re trying to say. Not much of what you’ve said makes any sense.