@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agoLemmy might, MIGHT have a small bias towards the leftlemm.eeimagemessage-square550fedilinkarrow-up11.28Karrow-down1312
arrow-up1964arrow-down1imageLemmy might, MIGHT have a small bias towards the leftlemm.ee@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square550fedilink
minus-square@Auxlink-2•1 year agoYou forgot one small thing - 99% of the population were literally slaves during these wonderful times.
minus-squarearchomrade [he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year ago 99% of the population were literally slaves … something seems off
minus-squarearchomrade [he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-21 year ago slavery and peasantry are distinct, though I understand they are similar in many important and relevant ways there are only pretty minor (and impractical) differences between feudal peasants and contemporary employer-employee arrangements There is a reason many have suggested we are headed toward (or already in) a neo-feudalism I say if we have to live as peasants anyway, let’s bring back tar and feathering Edit: hell, we even still have lord and tenant as titles
minus-square@Auxlink-1•1 year agoContemporary employer-employee arrangements are not even close to the feudal peasantry.
minus-squarearchomrade [he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoDamn, guess i’ll just take your word for it. I was reading this but maybe you’re reading something else.
You forgot one small thing - 99% of the population were literally slaves during these wonderful times.
… something seems off
Well, if you think that peasantry was cool…
There is a reason many have suggested we are headed toward (or already in) a neo-feudalism
I say if we have to live as peasants anyway, let’s bring back tar and feathering
Edit: hell, we even still have lord and tenant as titles
Contemporary employer-employee arrangements are not even close to the feudal peasantry.
Damn, guess i’ll just take your word for it.
I was reading this but maybe you’re reading something else.
That’s some commie lunacy.