• @SaakoPaahtaa
    link
    11 year ago

    Huh? In the rare case you are not misreading my comments due to being embarrassed, you REALLY need to educate yourself on the subject.

      • @SaakoPaahtaa
        link
        11 year ago

        Ukraine is existential to rus*ia. The invasion was always going to happen, it was just a matter of when.

        You’d know this if you’d knew even a little bit of geopolitics over the region. Like literally the tiniest amount of education would’ve saved you all these messages.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          0
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The invasion was always going to happen

          If you agree with Putin, yes.

          Hold on - am I talking to Putin right now? Or just his personal aide?

          Am I going to read about a Russian (that’s how you spell it, not Rus*ia) social media secretary being disappeared after embarrassing themselves online?

          • @SaakoPaahtaa
            link
            21 year ago

            If you agree with Putin, yes.

            Who I agree with is irrelevant to reality. Sadly, he never asked my opinion on the invasion. I’m just stating the facts here, facts about reality which does seem like the sticking point with you.

            And I don’t spell rus*ia with a capital r, they don’t deserve it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              01 year ago

              Who I agree with is irrelevant to reality

              So, you do agree.

              Also, it’s not the capitalisation I’m disputing. And I don’t believe your posturing.

              • @SaakoPaahtaa
                link
                01 year ago

                I don’t agree with him. But I acknowledge the existence of his reasons. Very simple concept.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  01 year ago

                  You seem to think his reasons are valid. Stop dancing around that. You said he “had no choice but to invade”. That means you think he was justified in invading.

                  He wasn’t.

                  I also “acknowledge the existence of his reasons” just the same as I “acknowledge the existence” of the reasons a child steals candy. They wanted it. The reason exists, sure, but it doesn’t make it a good or valid one.

                  • @SaakoPaahtaa
                    link
                    1
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    You seem to think his reasons are valid.

                    I dont

                    You said he “had no choice but to invade”.

                    Yep

                    That means you think he was justified in invading.

                    What? :D you literally just quoted me? :D Did I say “I think he had no choice but to invade and I agree with his reasons and the conclusions he came to” or “had no choice but to invade”.

                    Man, you truly are a tankie. Like a labgrown unfiltered nazi, sorry, tankie.