Up untill a week ago Nofrills carried these “three packs” of salmon for $10. Now the same pack contains two for the same $10. I thought it felt light when I bought it yesterday.

This comes to about $0.02 increase per gram, and a $1.10 price increase overall. Or a 11% increase in price overall. Meanwhile inflation is at 6-7%?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I just wish the weights were consistent across similar products. I’ve seen some supermarkets where one brand uses cost per gram while another brand uses cost per 100 grams, and yet another brand uses cost per kg, all for the same product. Some toilet papers are cost per sheet, some are cost per 100 sheets, some are cost per roll. In the USA, one item might use price per ounce while the product next to it uses price per pound. Some packs of soft drink cans use price per can while others use price per 100mL or per fluid ounce.

    Drives me crazy.

    • @SoleInvictus
      link
      English
      31 year ago

      This is as designed. It’s like shopping for mattresses, they don’t want you to comparison shop.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Unit pricing is mandated in many jurisdictions, however many of them don’t mandate the specific units that are used. I wish they’d do that so that we could properly compare items.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          The marketing law in Denmark does that. With few exceptions, everything must have the price displayed in the proper unit (liter, kilogram, meter, square metres or cubic metres) in addition to the price pr. item.

    • meridian
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Price per roll has to be the worst seeing how rolls are different thicknesses