• @lemme_at_it
    link
    English
    710 months ago

    I read a theory about why Ukraine has not completely destroyed the bridge to Crimea, even if they were able to, was to leave a way out & not fight the occupying troops into a corner, at which point their destructive unpredictability is worse than just letting them leave . This could be similar

    • @severien
      link
      English
      410 months ago

      No, that doesn’t make a lot of sense. Russia has enough boats/ships to evacuate Crimea if they wanted. They used to supply the whole Crimea woth ships before the bridge was built.

      If Ukraine could, they would definitely destroy the bridge. But it’s just very difficult task.

      • @ChonkyOwlbear
        link
        English
        310 months ago

        Putin would forbid any evacuation plans. A bridge allows scared soldiers a way to run away without permission from command.

        • @severien
          link
          English
          010 months ago

          WTF, the bridge has checkpoints on both sides, you’re not going to somehow sneak thousands of soldiers.

          • @ChonkyOwlbear
            link
            English
            210 months ago

            What checkpoint is going to stand against an army in full retreat?

            • @severien
              link
              English
              010 months ago

              You think they would mutiny? Then they can just steal some of the many ships in the harbors.

              And again, 20 km long bridge is a perfect place to destroy / stop whatever you want. It’s a chokepoint, hell to get through if the other sode doesn’t want to let you go through.