@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year ago>:(feddit.deimagemessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up1709arrow-down164
arrow-up1645arrow-down1image>:(feddit.de@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square43fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink7•1 year agoUh huh, just like how people forgot Nixon and his peace signs.
minus-square@samus12345linkEnglish-1•1 year agoNo pictures of that were in any textbooks I had. Things that paint the US in a negative light tend to be glossed over in US schools - at least, they were when I was in it ages ago. Can’t imagine that’s changed much.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 year agoBruh, I’m pretty sure your textbooks covered Watergate, assuming you went to school after it. Now, maybe your school and/or teacher sucked and tried to cram it into their one hour coverage of Vietnam, but it was in there, I promise. (Unless you went to a religious school, then I’ll believe any claim you make but note that it isn’t typical)
minus-square@samus12345linkEnglish0•1 year agoI said that picture wasn’t in there, and “glossed over” doesn’t mean there was no negativity at all. Yes, Watergate was mentioned.
Uh huh, just like how people forgot Nixon and his peace signs.
No pictures of that were in any textbooks I had. Things that paint the US in a negative light tend to be glossed over in US schools - at least, they were when I was in it ages ago. Can’t imagine that’s changed much.
Bruh, I’m pretty sure your textbooks covered Watergate, assuming you went to school after it.
Now, maybe your school and/or teacher sucked and tried to cram it into their one hour coverage of Vietnam, but it was in there, I promise.
(Unless you went to a religious school, then I’ll believe any claim you make but note that it isn’t typical)
I said that picture wasn’t in there, and “glossed over” doesn’t mean there was no negativity at all. Yes, Watergate was mentioned.