• BrokebackHampton
    link
    fedilink
    211 year ago

    It’d be nice to get back to that level of civility where we can disagree and not cheer the death of other.

    Thick irony when talking about the guy who quite literally cheered as AIDS wreaked havoc on gay people

      • Primarily0617
        link
        fedilink
        141 year ago

        guys.

        Guys.

        GUYS!

        Reagan didn’t literally text me the party popper emoji when freddie mercury died so he must be a friend to the lgbt spectrum

          • Primarily0617
            link
            fedilink
            141 year ago

            you’ve been provided evidence of reagan’s attitude on the aids pandemic

            you just haven’t addressed it because it’s easier to pretend it hasn’t been provided than confront the fact that gop daddy might not have been the second coming of christ

              • Primarily0617
                link
                fedilink
                9
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                we could argue until we were both blue in the face and your position would still be that because he didn’t literally crack out a fortnite dance that it doesn’t really count as cheering and that therefore he was as sympathetic as it was possible to be

                the fact is he abused his position to cause more gay people afflicted by HIV to die than had to, and entirely because it suited him to do so

              • BrokebackHampton
                link
                fedilink
                71 year ago

                I don’t think “He was just indifferent towards the death of entire sectors of the population based on their sexual identity” is the solid refutation you think it is

              • Flying Squid
                link
                41 year ago

                “Cheered” doesn’t necessarily mean getting up and doing a cheerleader dance while yelling. It can also mean encouraged.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                41 year ago

                He was in a position of power to ease the suffering of victims of a pandemic. He didn’t act until he couldn’t avoid it anymore. It doesn’t matter if his intent was apathy or hatred. His actions are what matters and for the leader of a nation to refuse to act on a public health crisis is abhorrent and inexcusable behavior.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    21 year ago

                    The distribution of power in the US is top-down. As the head of state, he was responsible for either instituting or delegating the policy and procedures of dealing with the aids pandemic. This ranges from healthcare to public outreach. He hired his cabinet, he had tremendous power to sway and inform public sentiment. He was one of the most popular candidates in the history of the US. He won 49 states in his re-election. The ignorance and homophobia that exploded in this time could have been mitigated to a large degree.

                    You’re correct on saying it was mishandled on many levels. Those levels were all largely subordinate to Reagan’s cabinet. The director of the CDC is appointed by the president. He could’ve.influenced how aids was researched, treated, spread, and traced. The responsibility for the poor treatment of aids falls squarely on Reagan’s shoulders