• madcaesar
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Sure, she might be dead, but the libs have been owned! Who’s the real winner here?

    • MapleEngineer@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think this was more about petulance. She had made refusing the vaccine her hill to die on and nothing was going to dissuade her.

      • blady_blah
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        I swear that stubbornness kills more old people than anything else. Won’t go see the doctor, won’t listen to the doctor, won’t take their medicine, won’t do exercise, won’t change diet, won’t quit smoking, etc. They should list “stubbornness” as the cause of death.

      • Labtec6@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        It will be “See! This vaccine killed this woman!” They will just leave out that she refused and didn’t actually take the vaccine. I remember seeing a few people claim that some of their friends took the vaccine and they died, even though they never did and was very anti-vaxx.

      • ProvableGecko
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 years ago

        Nobody wins

        No actually, the person next on the transplant list is the clear winner here

      • MapleEngineer@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        In the end, when it became clear to everyone that the vaccine was safe and effective she had made refusing her entire identity. She felt heroic. She just couldn’t bring herself to give up her crusade and slowly died because she was stubborn.