• osarusan
    link
    fedilink
    391 year ago

    One party says it was spontaneous consent and the other party said it was not, so how do we as the internet observer what it truly was?

    You are a clown.

      • osarusan
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Dude, can you argue without resorting to insults? All it does is make you look desperate because you can’t focus on the subject, you have to attack the individual.

      • osarusan
        link
        fedilink
        201 year ago

        No man. Use your fucking brain. This is either one of the most intellectually dishonest arguments I have ever seen or you are truly an idiot.

        You’re saying the equivalent of “How do we know person A punched person B, and it wasn’t person B who slammed his face into person A’s fist? shrug We as internet observers just can’t know.”

        It’s disgustingly dishonest. Everyone is trying to tell you this and you keep retreating further. Step out of your shoes or whatever personal reason is causing you to have this cognitive dissonance and look the situation honestly. You should see that your posts defending this have been pathetic and dishonest.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -21 year ago

          Dude, can you argue without resorting to insults? All it does is make you look desperate because you can’t focus on the subject, you have to attack the individual.

          • osarusan
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            What on earth are you talked about? I literally attacked his argument, not him.

            You, on the other hand, offered nothing but tone trolling.