alphacyberranger to Programmer [email protected]English • 1 year agoIts not wrong thoughimagemessage-square134arrow-up1923arrow-down185
arrow-up1838arrow-down1imageIts not wrong thoughalphacyberranger to Programmer [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square134
minus-squarenewIdentitylinkfedilink14•1 year agoA decompiler won’t give you the source code. Just some code that might not even necessarily work when compiled back.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-1•1 year agoFrom the point of view of the decompiler machine code is indeed the source code though
minus-square@over_cloxlink-2•1 year agoAnd? Decompilers aren’t for noobs. So what if it gives you variable and function names like A000, A001, etc? It can still lead a seasoned programmer where to go in the raw machine code to mod some things.
A decompiler won’t give you the source code. Just some code that might not even necessarily work when compiled back.
From the point of view of the decompiler machine code is indeed the source code though
And? Decompilers aren’t for noobs. So what if it gives you variable and function names like A000, A001, etc?
It can still lead a seasoned programmer where to go in the raw machine code to mod some things.
You’re actually chatting with a hacker that made No-CD hacks.