• Flying SquidOP
    link
    361 year ago

    Sorry… why do you think people on the left wouldn’t be in favor of removing tax loopholes for rich people?

    • @Kerred
      link
      -10
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Sorry I didn’t intend to bring sides into this, I am referring to the super rich and poor. Not left or right. Is that okay?

      I think both voters on both sides would be in favor of removing tax loopholes. But I imagine the wealthy on both sides would be hesitant?

      Assuming if you are super rich that takes priority over political parties. Would the Military Industrial Complex be a similar example?

      • Flying SquidOP
        link
        381 year ago

        The wealthy are only on one side- their own. The aren’t left or right, they’re just greedy hoarders. Their ideology goes as far as their wallet. They give to politics to get their way and they give to charities to get tax write-offs.

        • Cosmonaut_Collin
          link
          19
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I think he problem is that the wealthy are lobbying for laws to keep their loopholes or make new ones. Unless we can find a way to keep lawmakers from accepting bribes, the lower class will always be at a disadvantage even if we do vote for better taxing of the rich.

        • @DarthBueller
          link
          21 year ago

          This goes along with some of the scholarship that talks about class morality. The moral calculus of one social class is essentially alien to other social classes. The upper class sees morality as a tool of controlling the masses and of limited personal utility, but middle class and working class have different concepts of morality as well (e.g., perceptions of theft vary dramtically, if I recall correctly). This is a concept I encountered ages ago in an anthropology course, but I can’t for the life of me give you a citation.

        • @Kerred
          link
          -91 year ago

          Okay good I felt like I was alone in that respect. Sometimes I feel like causing two partiess to fight is what the richest want so they can get away with anything sometimes lol.

          But I’m sure that’s not true, and if it is I would be sad people have been tricked into choosing sides and being brainwashed to hate for the gain of others who couldn’t care.

          • norbert
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            It’s unfortunate that our entire culture has been boiled down to a few wedge issues by people with no interest in bettering the common persons life. Your stance on Gods/Guns/Gays pretty much determines how you’ll vote at this point.

    • @Kerred
      link
      -13
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Oh another Q I had was the student debt relief.

      Isn’t student debt relief just a short term fix? Yes debt relief is something I would vote for, but Like that money has to go somewhere right? Wouldn’t it be better to lower the cost of the out of control education or health care first to make it easier to provide more affordable universal care in the future?

      Unless other country with universal care charge $20 for a cough drop at the distributor level for hospitals, then disregard my statement 😄

      • Flying SquidOP
        link
        311 year ago

        Why not give people student debt relief and make college free and have universal healthcare? It’s not like you have to pick one.

        • @Strangle
          link
          -11 year ago

          How much are you willing to give up of your own pay cheque to fund that?

          • @vongraff
            link
            31 year ago

            I’m more than willing to pay more in taxes as it will be offset by not paying my expensive monthly health insurance premium. Even bureaucrats would be better than insurance “for profit” flunkies in deciding what health decisions I’m allowed to make.

        • @Kerred
          link
          -101 year ago

          I am just going to guess no one will make that happen for another 150 years, but it’s a nice dream isn’t it.

          But my rationality is if you start with a long term plan for universal health and education, debt relief would follow suit.

          I am just confused why debt relief is headlined and no long term solutions, as if the culture wants to hide long term solutions.

      • @AA5B
        link
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes, forgiving student loans can realistically only be a one time fix, but:

        — most of these are for a previously existing forgiveness program that was managed so poorly no one could qualify

        — halting payments as part of COViD relief while continuing to accrue interest means that some people are getting hit with ballooning payments after year of none

        But of course the real problem is how to get college education costs back under control. They have been going up much faster than inflation for decades, making a good education much harder to afford than for the rich devious generation

        — a big part of this is reduced state spending on education, so public school costs go up as fast as private. States need to start investing more in public universities again. Top tier private schools will always command any price but most private schools would need to compete if public universities were affordable

        — some states are starting to offer some amount of college free

    • diprount_tomato
      link
      -151 year ago

      Because current measures only make rich people flee elsewhere, which moves the tax burden to the middle class, which becomes poorer due to this and other factors, and then we have a few rich guys living elsewhere and a poor mass

      • Flying SquidOP
        link
        161 year ago

        Flee where exactly? If this were national, they’d have to flee the country. And good riddance to them and their hoarding. They improve nothing.

        • Andjhostet
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          If all the leeches on society fled we’d be much better off. Let them leave. They don’t pay their fair share anyways, and their neoliberal lobbying has destroyed this country.

        • diprount_tomato
          link
          -9
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Tax havens. Ever heard of the Caymans, the Bahamas and so on?

          • Flying SquidOP
            link
            101 year ago

            You mean the things they already use and wouldn’t be able to if they lived in the U.S. and the loopholes were closed? What about them?

              • Flying SquidOP
                link
                81 year ago

                What? No, I want people to pay taxes in the country they live in. What on Earth are you talking about?

                • diprount_tomato
                  link
                  -131 year ago

                  So you want to close the borders and not allow someone to migrate? Like, you move to another country but you still have to pay taxes to your native country + your new one?

                  • Flying SquidOP
                    link
                    121 year ago

                    Again, no. I want people who live in the U.S. to pay taxes. I don’t know how I can be more clear on this. If billionaires don’t want to pay taxes in the U.S., they don’t have to live in the U.S.

                    Let them go. They provide no value. They’re hoarders, not job creators.

                  • Chetzemoka
                    link
                    fedilink
                    21 year ago

                    You already have to do this in the US. The first $120,000 of income is exempt from federal taxes when you live abroad, but everything above that is subject to US federal income tax.

                    And you don’t have to MOVE there to shelter tax. You just create a shell corporation that is housed there virtually that owns your yacht, your third house, your businesses. That’s why there are 800,000 corporations with an address in the British Virgin Islands even though the main island is only 22km long and the entire country only has around 30,000 people in it.

                    You clearly have no idea how any of this really works and you’re just parroting things you heard or read somewhere. Let me suggest you stop talking and try to learn something here instead.

                    Rich people are not going to flee the United States because of taxes for two reasons: We have good infrastructure (relatively speaking anyway) and we have a reliable, predictable business court system.

                    Do you know why Cayman, Bahamas, and British Virgin Islands are actually preferred for creation of shell corporations? Because their court systems appeal all the way to the United Kingdom supreme court. Stable business court system is the reason those countries were able to take advantage of loopholes in our tax code.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    01 year ago

                    That’s exactly how it works. You want to retain your US citizenship while living abroad, you pay US taxes. Ask anyone. This is common knowledge. The only way out of it is to renounce US citizenship and it turns out that very few rich people actually want to do that because it has giant ripple effects on everything they own and often their extended family and how they can manage their wealth and even where they can give money to support causes they believe in.

                    The only way around this is through off-shore tax havens that can be taken advantage of through loopholes in the tax code which in turn are exactly what people are talking about addressing here.

                    Sorry you didn’t get the memo.

          • Chetzemoka
            link
            fedilink
            5
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Have you ever LIVED in one of those tax havens? Because I have, and trust me, rich folks ain’t up and moving to a tiny wild west country controlled by black people anytime soon. Especially when they can get the exact same tax havens benefits in Delaware, Wyoming, Nevada…

            Stop falling for the propaganda that the Caribbean is causing problems for us. They’re not. Our tax code created the incentives. We’re the problem.

              • Chetzemoka
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You’re wrong. Accept it. The idea that the rich will flee if we tax them is propaganda perpetuated by the rich to keep us from trying.

                • diprount_tomato
                  link
                  11 year ago

                  You think it’s propaganda, I know it has already happened several times, just not in the US because they’re in charge of it

                  • Chetzemoka
                    link
                    fedilink
                    2
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Oh you know, do you? Do share please.

                    It hasn’t happened in the US and it isn’t going to happen in the US because above all else, rich people favor the quality of life they’re able to achieve in rich countries. Where are they gonna flee, the EU? Where taxes are already higher? Ireland you said? A tiny country with little in the way of American-style luxury amenities that has zero interest in allowing them to immigrate there?

                    The rich will stay just like they did back in the 50s when the highest marginal tax rate was 90%. It’s time to make them pay their share for the benefits they gain from this country.

        • diprount_tomato
          link
          11 year ago

          Yes, they as people don’t move elsewhere, but their companies sure do, and that affects tax collection