• @Edgelord_Of_Tomorrow
    link
    11 year ago

    Efficiency. You’re collecting 70% (potentially 80%) of the available energy. The best PV is below 30% and the best molten salts are 35% max.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      I could not see where the 70% comes from, apart from the round trip efficiency of the heat capture. I dont know if that is what you are referring to. Do they have a input v output energy comparison somewhere?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      I am listening to a The Solar Insiders Podcast, which is interviewing the CEO of RayGen (thanks for intoducing it to me, really cool).

      the 70% is the efificency of the energy storage, which is similar to pumped hydro. ie, they put in 1MWh to the chiller, and will recover 0.7MWh from the organic rankin cycle turbine.

      so, they get the 30% of the solar (or whatever it is), plus the recovery of the heat. They were saying that for 1 tower, they get 1MW of solar and 2MW of heat. but they never said how much of the 2MW of heat gets converted to electricity, or what the efficiency is, but it sounds like they need to consume electricity to use the ORC (ie for the chiller).

      one other thing is that they ORCs can provide grid inertia which is a cool outcome too.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      I thought molten salt storage gets like 90% efficiency. What’s the advantage of storing energy by cooling blocks?

      • @Edgelord_Of_Tomorrow
        link
        11 year ago

        To run a heat engine you need a temperature difference in order to generate work. When your system generates heat as a byproduct you can amplify the amount of work by increasing the temperature difference. This is how the cold block “stores” energy.

        What’s your source on 90% efficiency? Here it’s stated 35% max.