Discover the magic of the internet at Imgur, a community powered entertainment destination. Lift your spirits with funny jokes, trending memes, entertaining gifs, inspiring stories, viral videos, and so much more from users like fer0n.
It takes a split second for me: video. Not sure if you’re aware, but you can also do it via Siri without the shortcut. Running the shortcut via Siri is also quite fast (a bit slower than running it directly, but definitely not more than a second).
Wow. I just checked mine, it turned out I have 54 alarms. As a programmer, I think still for modern CPUs 1k should take no time.
I noticed it run faster from Shortcuts app like 3-4 seconds.
I thought the issue is related to repeat clause but when I created a counter to 100 it did finish in a second so it seems not be the case.
I’m certain that shortcuts use to work faster at some point. It could be Apple introduced speed throttle or new functions caused overhead performance impact.
It takes a split second for me: video. Not sure if you’re aware, but you can also do it via Siri without the shortcut. Running the shortcut via Siri is also quite fast (a bit slower than running it directly, but definitely not more than a second).
Wow. I just checked mine, it turned out I have 54 alarms. As a programmer, I think still for modern CPUs 1k should take no time.
I noticed it run faster from Shortcuts app like 3-4 seconds.
I thought the issue is related to repeat clause but when I created a counter to 100 it did finish in a second so it seems not be the case.
I’m certain that shortcuts use to work faster at some point. It could be Apple introduced speed throttle or new functions caused overhead performance impact.