House Freedom Caucus member Rep. Ken Buck (R-CO) told CNN's Jake Tapper on Monday that proposals by House GOP leadership to impeach President Joe Biden lack any sort of evidence to move forward — the latest in a series of criticisms he has made of the plan.However, he added, many of his Republican c...

House Freedom Caucus member Rep. Ken Buck (R-CO) told CNN’s Jake Tapper on Monday that proposals by House GOP leadership to impeach President Joe Biden lack any sort of evidence to move forward — the latest in a series of criticisms he has made of the plan.However, he added, many of his Republican c…

  • snooggums
    50•1 year ago

    The votes weren’t there because of Republicans being complicit made a political process political.

    Fuck off with your bullshit.

    • @BB69
      -7•1 year ago

      It’s opening Pandora’s box in a way. Now we have to deal with republicans in the house forcing McCarthy to bring impeachment to a vote, which is eerily reminiscent of democrats forcing Pelosi to do the same.

      • snooggums
        21•1 year ago

        Republicans impeached Clinton first dumbass.

        You can’t blame the Dems for impeaching Trump for actual crimes and then Republicans impeaching over nothing again.

        • @BB69
          -3•1 year ago

          No need to name call.

          Republicans did that in the 90s after Clinton perjured himself and we stuffed the genie back in the bottle after that.

          It was a different country then, lying under oath meant something then, as well as perceived immorality by the president.

          • Skyler
            9•1 year ago

            Republicans did that in the 90s after Clinton perjured himself

            About what, again? Oh yeah, a blowjob.

            But you’re right, it’s exactly the same thing as inciting a mob to try and stop democracy from functioning.

            How very both sides enlightened centrist of you.

            • @BB69
              0•1 year ago

              Perjury is perjury.

              Why are you referencing the second impeachment? Congress couldn’t do anything at that point. Trump was already out of office. That’s akin to the trial of the dead pope, what would it have changed?

              Now, if you referenced the first, maybe there would be something else to discuss. But I’m guessing you didn’t since it isn’t as inflammatory as Jan 6th

              I vote straight democrat btw. Far from a centrist, but I am a realist who recognizes when something is unnecessary.

          • snooggums
            6•1 year ago

            You do deserve being called names because you are a lying sack of shit.

            • @BB69
              -1•1 year ago

              Uhm. What am I lying about?

              • snooggums
                7•1 year ago

                “Now we have to deal with republicans in the house forcing McCarthy to bring impeachment to a vote, which is eerily reminiscent of democrats forcing Pelosi to do the same.”

                You are just making shit up.

                  • snooggums
                    7•1 year ago

                    Republicans pressuring McCarthy to impeach Biden with no evidence of any wrongdoing is not reminiscent of democrats pressuring, not forcing, Pelosi to impeach Trump when Pelosi was also accusing Trump of a coverup. Your link does not support your statement in any way.

                    They are in no way comparable beyond “party wants to do X and leadership is hesitant”, which is basically a description of the state of congress any any point in time.

          • mrnotoriousman
            2•1 year ago

            Clinton hasn’t even met Lewinski when they started the Starr investigation. I’m sure you know that tho

        • @BB69
          -2•1 year ago

          What, because I’m politically educated and not reactionary?