@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agowelcomediscuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square41fedilinkarrow-up1587arrow-down138
arrow-up1549arrow-down1imagewelcomediscuss.tchncs.de@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square41fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish19•1 year ago90° isn’t any more perfect than 89°. Unless it was supposed to be 90°. So if you post this exact thing but include the right angle indicator, that would make the image work as intended.
minus-square@samus12345linkEnglish7•edit-21 year agoIt’s supposed to be 89° but is actually 87°. So it qualifies as imperfect.
minus-square@NightAuthorlinkEnglish3•1 year agoLove it (after I confirmed it to be true via the rotate function in the photo editor)
90° isn’t any more perfect than 89°. Unless it was supposed to be 90°.
So if you post this exact thing but include the right angle indicator, that would make the image work as intended.
It’s supposed to be 89° but is actually 87°. So it qualifies as imperfect.
Love it (after I confirmed it to be true via the rotate function in the photo editor)
Oh shi-