If you’re from Terre Haute then you know housing prices in Terre Haute are nowhere near 500k, in fact, there are many houses sub-200k, so what exactly was the point of this exchange?
And again, I’ll be downvoting all your posts here until you say something factual and meaningful. Don’t worry.
You mean the ones in high crime neighborhoods? I’m sure they are sub-200k. You know what doesn’t pay great here? Bus driving. So, again, cheaper house for lesser pay. What’s the point?
His wife is potentially dying of cancer, so a cheaper house is necessary. Yep, sometimes that means a “less desirable” house - though I literally wouldn’t be caught dead in Terre Haute. Your initial claim was that those houses did not exist. Then you’ve moved the goalposts left and right trying desperately to be correct.
Worse case scenario he could move to my neighborhood for, at most, 265, and live in a crime-free area with great schools.
I really don’t understand what you think your argument here is. You’re just spewing bullshit.
No, he said he couldn’t afford to live in his current house if his wife died. If he was on a single income. If he had to move and find somewhere cheaper to live.
And your suggestion is, as far as I can tell, to move somewhere cheaper and take a lower paying job, putting him in the exact same situation.
But I’m more interested in you calling me a liar about where I live. Can you provide evidence that I am lying about that? Can you quote me saying I live somewhere else in another thread? Calling me a liar about that is quite the accusation and I don’t think I can get past it and keep talking about this other subject until you address it. Sorry.
Everything you’ve claimed here is a lie of some sort, and it was reasonable, given your utter ignorance of Indiana, to think you were lying about that, too.
I kind of still do. You are, at your core, when no one can catch you, a fundamentally dishonest person.
Wait, so you’re saying in order to save money, they should move to a place with cheaper houses that pays less? Do you not see the problem there?
Don’t forget to downvote this post.
Oh I won’t, don’t worry. You’re lying and that’s the entire point of downvotes - disputing the value of false information.
Where are you really from?
I’m from Terre Haute, Indidna and I have never made that a secret if you want to look through my comment history.
Don’t forget to downvote this post.
If you’re from Terre Haute then you know housing prices in Terre Haute are nowhere near 500k, in fact, there are many houses sub-200k, so what exactly was the point of this exchange?
And again, I’ll be downvoting all your posts here until you say something factual and meaningful. Don’t worry.
You mean the ones in high crime neighborhoods? I’m sure they are sub-200k. You know what doesn’t pay great here? Bus driving. So, again, cheaper house for lesser pay. What’s the point?
His wife is potentially dying of cancer, so a cheaper house is necessary. Yep, sometimes that means a “less desirable” house - though I literally wouldn’t be caught dead in Terre Haute. Your initial claim was that those houses did not exist. Then you’ve moved the goalposts left and right trying desperately to be correct.
Worse case scenario he could move to my neighborhood for, at most, 265, and live in a crime-free area with great schools.
I really don’t understand what you think your argument here is. You’re just spewing bullshit.
No, he said he couldn’t afford to live in his current house if his wife died. If he was on a single income. If he had to move and find somewhere cheaper to live.
And your suggestion is, as far as I can tell, to move somewhere cheaper and take a lower paying job, putting him in the exact same situation.
But I’m more interested in you calling me a liar about where I live. Can you provide evidence that I am lying about that? Can you quote me saying I live somewhere else in another thread? Calling me a liar about that is quite the accusation and I don’t think I can get past it and keep talking about this other subject until you address it. Sorry.
Everything you’ve claimed here is a lie of some sort, and it was reasonable, given your utter ignorance of Indiana, to think you were lying about that, too.
I kind of still do. You are, at your core, when no one can catch you, a fundamentally dishonest person.
Please back that up with evidence. Otherwise, that claim itself is a lie.
Remember, you said everything.
Even if you can find ten things that are lies, you now have to show that everything I have claimed is a lie.
Unless you yourself are lying.